![]() ![]() I personally prefer things a little ring-a-ding-ding-ier if you catch my drift, but Fallout 3 is still an equally worthwhile title.įallout 4, however, is a whole other beast entirely, and while it’s exceptional, it still doesn’t quite meet the same level of perfection in Bethesda’s previous Fallout games. To say you preferred one of those titles is just expressing a preference for branching narratives verses something more carefully constructed, it’s the choice between a gray-scale color palate or a sun-soaked wasteland. ![]() Most people would probably praise Fallout 3 as the pinnacle of the series, but New Vegas and Fallout 3 are so close in their construction that it’s really a quibble. When the dust settles, though, how does Fallout 4 compare to the previous entries in the series? If you’re literate (and why would you be here if you weren’t), then you already know my thoughts. Seriously, just check out r/Fallout if you want a healthy dose of critical commentary. However, the game isn’t without it’s flaws, and fans have been quick to point them out extensively and at great length. ![]() Certain new additions to the gameplay, like extra layers of weapon customization and the ability to construct a settlement from the ground up, make Fallout 4 a unique (and frickin’ awesome) addition to the canon. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |